Seeking payback for the violent protests that disrupted its Dakota Access project, pipeline company Energy Transfer targets ...

The controversy surrounding the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) showcased for a generation the consequences of failing to account for the total impacts of development on and near indigenous lands, ...

Dakota Access spent billions developing the pipeline and has standing contracts requiring DAPL to continue transporting oil, the company wrote in a brief filed in court. Since 2017, the more than ...

Section 1. Policy. The Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) under development by Dakota Access, LLC, represents a substantial, multi-billion-dollar private investment in our Nation’s energy infrastructure.

North Dakota is asking a judge to order the U.S. to pay $38 million for costs it says it suffered policing protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, also known as DAPL, in 2016 and 2017.

Water is life — and in North Dakota the Standing Rock Sioux tribe is leading an inspiring, historic battle to protect it by stopping the Dakota Access pipeline. This pipeline would carry almost 19 ...

Dakota Access in court documents emphasized its business interest in keeping the pipeline operational. The states have argued shutting down DAPL would harm the regional economy, violate state ...

D.C., added a mile-marker post from last year’s Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) protest to the exhibition Nation to Nation: Treaties Between the United States and American Indian Nations.

A column by Winona LaDuke, an Ojibwe writer and economist on Minnesota’s White Earth Reservation. She also is co-curator of ...