The lawsuit asserts that any ban on mandatory meetings infringes the employers' free-speech rights as enshrined in the 1st Amendment. (State officials haven't yet filed a response.) "Because of SB ...

That decision was one of the Court’s most egregious First Amendment mistakes this century — and last week, a case landed on its docket asking the justices to fix it. In Hill v. Colorado ...

Amazon workers gather outside the company's warehouse in Staten Island, N.Y., to vote on unionization in 2022. They eventually affiliated with the Teamsters. (Robert Bumsted / Associated Press) ...

It’s always heartening to see the business establishment stand up for constitutional principles. Well, almost always. Among the exceptions is when business leaders wrap themselves in the ...

From Friday's decision by Judge Michael Watson (S.D. Ohio) in Sullivan v. Ohio State Univ.: American public universities have traditionally "prided ...

The First Amendment fight over Texas’ age-verification ... level of legal scrutiny should apply to the law, effectively killing it. That 5-4 case, the porn industry argues, should settle the ...

The bill also would have required the FWP commission to allow an unlimited number of licenses to be issued and each hunter or ...

That brings us back to the lawsuit the Chamber and Restaurant Assn. filed in Sacramento federal court. The lawsuit asserts that any ban on mandatory meetings infringes the employers' free-speech ...