Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court that set forth the legal test used when U.S. federal courts must defer to a government agency's interpretation of a law or statute. [1]

Chevron is likely the most frequently cited case in American administrative law and is the origin of the term "Chevron deference." Several subsequent cases have limited the scope of agency actions that are entitled to Chevron deference.

2024年6月28日 · By a vote of 6-3, the justices overruled their landmark 1984 decision in Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, which gave rise to the doctrine known as the Chevron doctrine.

When there was a challenge to the Environmental Protection Agency’s interpretation of the word “source” in a law regulating air pollution, the Supreme Court considered whether silence (or ambiguity) in a statute means that a reviewing court can freely impose its own interpretation.

EPA regulations promulgated in 1981 to implement the permit requirement allow a State to adopt a plantwide definition of the term "stationary source," under which an existing plant that contains several pollution-emitting devices may install or modify one piece of equipment without meeting the permit conditions if the alteration will not increas...

CHEVRON U. S. A. v. NATURAL RES. DEF. COUNCIL 841 837 Opinion of the Court 14, 1981. 46 Fed. Reg. 50766. Respondents3 filed a timely petition for review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit pursuant to 42 U. S. C. § 7607(b)(1).4 The Court of Appeals set aside the regu-lations.

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. National Resources Defense Council, Inc., legal case, decided on June 25, 1984, in which the U.S. Supreme Court established a longstanding judicial precedent known as the Chevron doctrine, also called Chevron deference.

Several environmental groups, including the Natural Resources Defense Council, challenged the bubble provision as contrary to the Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit set aside the EPA regulation as inappropriate for a program enacted to improve air quality.

National Resources Defense Council, Inc. (Respondents) petitioned for review in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and the Court of Appeals set aside the regulation. The Amendments were lengthy, detailed and complex.

Get Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), United States Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee.